Larry Drapkin of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp (Los Angeles, California, USA) recently teamed with Lenny Samuels of Berger Singerman (Florida, USA) on a litigation matter involving restrictive covenants (entered into and governed pursuant to Florida law and venue) which adversely impacted MSK's corporate client based in California. The seamless representation of the defendant in the Florida litigation and of the other related party (the California entity) made it possible for them to achieve a favorable resolution with an otherwise notoriously hard nosed corporate plaintiff. It was particularly useful that MSK could, within two hours of becoming aware of the Florida litigation, inform its client's general counsel that it was recommending Mr. Samuels to handle the Florida litigation and that, among other things, he had previously litigated similar issues against the plaintiff and the plaintiff's counsel in the present matter. The client's general counsel, was very impressed with the quick response and excellent coordination among TAGLaw counsel who, in this case, have served as co-counsel in previous litigation matters.
-Larry C. Drapkin; Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP (Los Angeles, California, USA)
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.
Larry Drapkin of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp (Los Angeles, California, USA) recently teamed with Lenny Samuels of Berger Singerman (Florida, USA) on a litigation matter involving restrictive covenants (entered into and governed pursuant to Florida law and venue) which adversely impacted MSK's corporate client based in California. The seamless representation of the defendant in the Florida litigation and of the other related party (the California entity) made it possible for them to achieve a favorable resolution with an otherwise notoriously hard nosed corporate plaintiff. It was particularly useful that MSK could, within two hours of becoming aware of the Florida litigation, inform its client's general counsel that it was recommending Mr. Samuels to handle the Florida litigation and that, among other things, he had previously litigated similar issues against the plaintiff and the plaintiff's counsel in the present matter. The client's general counsel, was very impressed with the quick response and excellent coordination among TAGLaw counsel who, in this case, have served as co-counsel in previous litigation matters.
